1972 Austin 1800 vs. 2008 Citroen C5
To start off, 2008 Citroen C5 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Austin 1800. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Austin 1800 would be higher. At 1,997 cc, 2008 Citroen C5 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Citroen C5 weights approximately 203 kg more than 1972 Austin 1800.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Citroen C5 (190 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 50 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Austin 1800. (140 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2008 Citroen C5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Austin 1800.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Austin 1800 | 2008 Citroen C5 | |
Make | Austin | Citroen |
Model | 1800 | C5 |
Year Released | 1972 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1797 cc | 1997 cc |
Horse Power | 86 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 140 Nm | 190 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4100 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 80.3 mm | 85 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88.9 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 10.8:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1190 kg | 1393 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 4140 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1820 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2760 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 49 L | 66 L |