1972 Austin 1800 vs. 2009 Nissan Cube
To start off, 2009 Nissan Cube is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Austin 1800. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Austin 1800 would be higher. Both 1972 Austin 1800 and 2009 Nissan Cube are equipped with a 1,797 cc engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Nissan Cube (120 HP) has 34 more horse power than 1972 Austin 1800. (86 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Nissan Cube should accelerate faster than 1972 Austin 1800.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 Austin 1800 (140 Nm) has 13 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Nissan Cube. (127 Nm). This means 1972 Austin 1800 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Nissan Cube.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Austin 1800 | 2009 Nissan Cube | |
| Make | Austin | Nissan |
| Model | 1800 | Cube |
| Year Released | 1972 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1797 cc | 1797 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 86 HP | 120 HP |
| Torque | 140 Nm | 127 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 4320 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1620 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2830 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 49 L | 82 L |
