1972 Austin 1800 vs. 2010 Daihatsu Sirion
To start off, 2010 Daihatsu Sirion is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Austin 1800. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Austin 1800 would be higher. At 1,797 cc (4 cylinders), 1972 Austin 1800 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 86 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 Austin 1800 (140 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 19 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Daihatsu Sirion. (121 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1972 Austin 1800 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Daihatsu Sirion.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Austin 1800 | 2010 Daihatsu Sirion | |
Make | Austin | Daihatsu |
Model | 1800 | Sirion |
Year Released | 1972 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1797 cc | 1298 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 86 HP | 86 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 140 Nm | 121 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 80.3 mm | 72 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88.9 mm | 79.7 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |