1972 Austin 1800 vs. 2010 Renault Trafic
To start off, 2010 Renault Trafic is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Austin 1800. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Austin 1800 would be higher. At 1,870 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Renault Trafic is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Renault Trafic (100 HP @ 3500 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 1972 Austin 1800. (86 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Renault Trafic should accelerate faster than 1972 Austin 1800.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Renault Trafic (241 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 101 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Austin 1800. (140 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2010 Renault Trafic will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Austin 1800.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Austin 1800 | 2010 Renault Trafic | |
| Make | Austin | Renault |
| Model | 1800 | Trafic |
| Year Released | 1972 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1797 cc | 1870 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 86 HP | 100 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Torque | 140 Nm | 241 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 80.3 mm | 80 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 88.9 mm | 93 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 9 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 4790 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1950 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1910 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 3100 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 49 L | 90 L |
