1972 Austin 1800 vs. 2010 Toyota Highlander
To start off, 2010 Toyota Highlander is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Austin 1800. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Austin 1800 would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Toyota Highlander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Toyota Highlander (270 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 184 more horse power than 1972 Austin 1800. (86 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Toyota Highlander should accelerate faster than 1972 Austin 1800.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Toyota Highlander (336 Nm @ 4700 RPM) has 196 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Austin 1800. (140 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2010 Toyota Highlander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Austin 1800.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Austin 1800 | 2010 Toyota Highlander | |
Make | Austin | Toyota |
Model | 1800 | Highlander |
Year Released | 1972 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1797 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 86 HP | 270 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 140 Nm | 336 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 4785 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2789 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 49 L | 73 L |