1972 Austin 1800 vs. 2011 Renault Clio
To start off, 2011 Renault Clio is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Austin 1800. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Austin 1800 would be higher. At 1,797 cc (4 cylinders), 1972 Austin 1800 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Austin 1800 (86 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 2011 Renault Clio. (60 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Austin 1800 should accelerate faster than 2011 Renault Clio.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 Austin 1800 (140 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 46 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Renault Clio. (94 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1972 Austin 1800 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Austin 1800 | 2011 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Austin | Renault |
| Model | 1800 | Clio |
| Year Released | 1972 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1797 cc | 1149 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 86 HP | 60 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 140 Nm | 94 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 80.3 mm | 69 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 88.9 mm | 76.8 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 3780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1420 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1650 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2480 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 49 L | 50 L |
