1972 Austin 2200 vs. 1951 Rolls-Royce Silver Dawn
To start off, 1972 Austin 2200 is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Rolls-Royce Silver Dawn. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Rolls-Royce Silver Dawn would be higher. At 4,566 cc (6 cylinders), 1951 Rolls-Royce Silver Dawn is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Rolls-Royce Silver Dawn weights approximately 679 kg more than 1972 Austin 2200.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Austin 2200 | 1951 Rolls-Royce Silver Dawn | |
Make | Austin | Rolls-Royce |
Model | 2200 | Silver Dawn |
Year Released | 1972 | 1951 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2227 cc | 4566 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 110 HP | 0 HP |
Top Speed | 163 km/hour | 139 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1181 kg | 1860 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 5170 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1680 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 3050 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 56 L | 108 L |