1972 Austin 2200 vs. 1951 Talbot Baby
To start off, 1972 Austin 2200 is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Talbot Baby. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Talbot Baby would be higher. At 2,690 cc (4 cylinders), 1951 Talbot Baby is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Austin 2200 (110 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 1951 Talbot Baby. (108 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Austin 2200 should accelerate faster than 1951 Talbot Baby. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Talbot Baby weights approximately 469 kg more than 1972 Austin 2200.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Austin 2200 | 1951 Talbot Baby | |
Make | Austin | Talbot |
Model | 2200 | Baby |
Year Released | 1972 | 1951 |
Engine Size | 2227 cc | 2690 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 110 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1181 kg | 1650 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 5060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 3130 mm |