1972 Austin 2200 vs. 1957 Triumph TR3
To start off, 1972 Austin 2200 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Triumph TR3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Triumph TR3 would be higher. At 2,227 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 Austin 2200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Austin 2200 (110 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 1957 Triumph TR3. (95 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Austin 2200 should accelerate faster than 1957 Triumph TR3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Austin 2200 weights approximately 256 kg more than 1957 Triumph TR3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Austin 2200 | 1957 Triumph TR3 | |
Make | Austin | Triumph |
Model | 2200 | TR3 |
Year Released | 1972 | 1957 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2227 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 110 HP | 95 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1181 kg | 925 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 3840 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1400 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1280 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2240 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 56 L | 29 L |