1972 Austin 2200 vs. 1963 Ford Taunus
To start off, 1972 Austin 2200 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Ford Taunus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Ford Taunus would be higher. At 2,227 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 Austin 2200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Austin 2200 (110 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 72 more horse power than 1963 Ford Taunus. (38 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Austin 2200 should accelerate faster than 1963 Ford Taunus. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Austin 2200 weights approximately 336 kg more than 1963 Ford Taunus. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Austin 2200 | 1963 Ford Taunus | |
Make | Austin | Ford |
Model | 2200 | Taunus |
Year Released | 1972 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2227 cc | 1183 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 110 HP | 38 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 76.2 mm | 80.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 81.3 mm | 58.9 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 7.8:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1181 kg | 845 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 4250 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2530 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 56 L | 50 L |