1972 Austin 2200 vs. 1968 Citroen Dyane 6
To start off, 1972 Austin 2200 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Citroen Dyane 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Citroen Dyane 6 would be higher. At 2,227 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 Austin 2200 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Austin 2200 weights approximately 591 kg more than 1968 Citroen Dyane 6.
Because 1972 Austin 2200 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Austin 2200. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1968 Citroen Dyane 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Austin 2200 | 1968 Citroen Dyane 6 | |
| Make | Austin | Citroen |
| Model | 2200 | Dyane 6 |
| Year Released | 1972 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2227 cc | 602 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 110 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1181 kg | 590 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 3880 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1510 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1550 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2410 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 56 L | 25 L |
