1972 Austin 2200 vs. 1969 Cadillac Eldorado
To start off, 1972 Austin 2200 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Cadillac Eldorado. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Cadillac Eldorado would be higher. At 7,732 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Cadillac Eldorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Cadillac Eldorado (228 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 118 more horse power than 1972 Austin 2200. (110 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1969 Cadillac Eldorado should accelerate faster than 1972 Austin 2200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Cadillac Eldorado weights approximately 889 kg more than 1972 Austin 2200. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1972 Austin 2200 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Austin 2200. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1969 Cadillac Eldorado, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Cadillac Eldorado (710 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 541 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Austin 2200. (169 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1969 Cadillac Eldorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Austin 2200.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Austin 2200 | 1969 Cadillac Eldorado | |
| Make | Austin | Cadillac |
| Model | 2200 | Eldorado |
| Year Released | 1972 | 1969 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2227 cc | 7732 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 110 HP | 228 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Torque | 169 Nm | 710 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 76.2 mm | 109.2 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 81.3 mm | 103.1 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 10.5:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1181 kg | 2070 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 5620 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 2040 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 3050 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 56 L | 79 L |
