1972 Austin 2200 vs. 1970 Ford Mustang
To start off, 1972 Austin 2200 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 7,014 cc (8 cylinders), 1970 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Austin 2200 (110 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 1970 Ford Mustang. (99 HP @ 5700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Austin 2200 should accelerate faster than 1970 Ford Mustang. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1970 Ford Mustang weights approximately 403 kg more than 1972 Austin 2200.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1970 Ford Mustang (637 Nm) has 468 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Austin 2200. (169 Nm). This means 1970 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Austin 2200.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Austin 2200 | 1970 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Austin | Ford |
Model | 2200 | Mustang |
Year Released | 1972 | 1970 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2227 cc | 7014 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 110 HP | 99 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Torque | 169 Nm | 637 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1181 kg | 1584 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1320 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2750 mm |