1972 Austin 2200 vs. 1970 Mazda 616
To start off, 1972 Austin 2200 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Mazda 616. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Mazda 616 would be higher. At 2,227 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 Austin 2200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Austin 2200 (110 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 1970 Mazda 616. (79 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Austin 2200 should accelerate faster than 1970 Mazda 616. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Austin 2200 weights approximately 271 kg more than 1970 Mazda 616. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1972 Austin 2200 (169 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 45 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 Mazda 616. (124 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1972 Austin 2200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 Mazda 616.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Austin 2200 | 1970 Mazda 616 | |
Make | Austin | Mazda |
Model | 2200 | 616 |
Year Released | 1972 | 1970 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2227 cc | 1586 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 110 HP | 79 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 169 Nm | 124 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 76.2 mm | 78 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 81.3 mm | 83 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1181 kg | 910 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 4160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2480 mm |