1972 Austin 2200 vs. 1980 Honda Accord
To start off, 1980 Honda Accord is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Austin 2200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Austin 2200 would be higher. At 2,227 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 Austin 2200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Austin 2200 (110 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 1980 Honda Accord. (80 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Austin 2200 should accelerate faster than 1980 Honda Accord. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Austin 2200 weights approximately 251 kg more than 1980 Honda Accord. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1972 Austin 2200 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Austin 2200. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Honda Accord, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 Austin 2200 (169 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 43 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Honda Accord. (126 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1972 Austin 2200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Honda Accord.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Austin 2200 | 1980 Honda Accord | |
Make | Austin | Honda |
Model | 2200 | Accord |
Year Released | 1972 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2227 cc | 1601 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 110 HP | 80 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Torque | 169 Nm | 126 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 76.2 mm | 77 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 81.3 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 8.4:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1181 kg | 930 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 4350 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2390 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 56 L | 50 L |