1972 Austin 2200 vs. 1981 Toyota Celica
To start off, 1981 Toyota Celica is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Austin 2200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Austin 2200 would be higher. At 2,562 cc, 1981 Toyota Celica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1981 Toyota Celica (118 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 1972 Austin 2200. (110 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1981 Toyota Celica should accelerate faster than 1972 Austin 2200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Austin 2200 weights approximately 1 kg more than 1981 Toyota Celica.
Let's talk about torque, 1981 Toyota Celica (215 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 46 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Austin 2200. (169 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1981 Toyota Celica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Austin 2200.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Austin 2200 | 1981 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Austin | Toyota |
Model | 2200 | Celica |
Year Released | 1972 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2227 cc | 2562 cc |
Horse Power | 110 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 169 Nm | 215 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1181 kg | 1180 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 4610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1320 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2640 mm |