1972 Austin 2200 vs. 1983 Pininfarina Coupe
To start off, 1983 Pininfarina Coupe is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Austin 2200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Austin 2200 would be higher. At 2,227 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 Austin 2200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Pininfarina Coupe (125 HP) has 15 more horse power than 1972 Austin 2200. (110 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1983 Pininfarina Coupe should accelerate faster than 1972 Austin 2200.
Because 1972 Austin 2200 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Austin 2200. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Pininfarina Coupe, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1983 Pininfarina Coupe (176 Nm) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Austin 2200. (169 Nm). This means 1983 Pininfarina Coupe will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Austin 2200.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Austin 2200 | 1983 Pininfarina Coupe | |
Make | Austin | Pininfarina |
Model | 2200 | Coupe |
Year Released | 1972 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2227 cc | 1995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 110 HP | 125 HP |
Torque | 169 Nm | 176 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 4070 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2450 mm |