1972 Austin 2200 vs. 1983 Toyota Model F

To start off, 1983 Toyota Model F is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Austin 2200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Austin 2200 would be higher. At 2,227 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 Austin 2200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Austin 2200 (110 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 1983 Toyota Model F. (76 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Austin 2200 should accelerate faster than 1983 Toyota Model F. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Toyota Model F weights approximately 119 kg more than 1972 Austin 2200.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 Austin 2200 (169 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 29 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Toyota Model F. (140 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 1972 Austin 2200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Toyota Model F. 1983 Toyota Model F has automatic transmission and 1972 Austin 2200 has manual transmission. 1972 Austin 2200 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1983 Toyota Model F will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

1972 Austin 2200 1983 Toyota Model F
Make Austin Toyota
Model 2200 Model F
Year Released 1972 1983
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2227 cc 1812 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 110 HP 76 HP
Engine RPM 5250 RPM 4800 RPM
Torque 169 Nm 140 Nm
Torque RPM 3500 RPM 3400 RPM
Engine Bore Size 76.2 mm 86 mm
Engine Stroke Size 81.3 mm 78 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.0:1 8.8:1
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 8 seats
Vehicle Weight 1181 kg 1300 kg
Vehicle Length 4250 mm 4290 mm
Vehicle Width 1450 mm 1680 mm
Vehicle Height 1440 mm 1820 mm
Wheelbase Size 2700 mm 2240 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]