1972 Austin 2200 vs. 1985 Citroen CX
To start off, 1985 Citroen CX is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Austin 2200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Austin 2200 would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 1985 Citroen CX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1985 Citroen CX (168 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 58 more horse power than 1972 Austin 2200. (110 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1985 Citroen CX should accelerate faster than 1972 Austin 2200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1985 Citroen CX weights approximately 313 kg more than 1972 Austin 2200. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1972 Austin 2200 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Austin 2200. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Citroen CX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1985 Citroen CX (300 Nm @ 3250 RPM) has 131 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Austin 2200. (169 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1985 Citroen CX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Austin 2200.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Austin 2200 | 1985 Citroen CX | |
| Make | Austin | Citroen |
| Model | 2200 | CX |
| Year Released | 1972 | 1985 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2227 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 110 HP | 168 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 169 Nm | 300 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3250 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 76.2 mm | 93 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 81.3 mm | 92 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 7.8:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1181 kg | 1494 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 4910 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 3100 mm |
