1972 Austin 2200 vs. 1986 Chrysler Daytona
To start off, 1986 Chrysler Daytona is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Austin 2200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Austin 2200 would be higher. At 2,227 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 Austin 2200 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1972 Austin 2200 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Austin 2200. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Chrysler Daytona, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Chrysler Daytona (243 Nm) has 74 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Austin 2200. (169 Nm). This means 1986 Chrysler Daytona will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Austin 2200.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Austin 2200 | 1986 Chrysler Daytona | |
Make | Austin | Chrysler |
Model | 2200 | Daytona |
Year Released | 1972 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2227 cc | 2210 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 110 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 169 Nm | 243 Nm |
Top Speed | 163 km/hour | 177 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |