1972 Austin 2200 vs. 1987 Ford Mustang
To start off, 1987 Ford Mustang is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Austin 2200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Austin 2200 would be higher. At 2,301 cc (4 cylinders), 1987 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Austin 2200 (110 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 21 more horse power than 1987 Ford Mustang. (89 HP @ 3800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Austin 2200 should accelerate faster than 1987 Ford Mustang. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1987 Ford Mustang weights approximately 69 kg more than 1972 Austin 2200.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1987 Ford Mustang (176 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Austin 2200. (169 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1987 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Austin 2200.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Austin 2200 | 1987 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Austin | Ford |
Model | 2200 | Mustang |
Year Released | 1972 | 1987 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2227 cc | 2301 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 110 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 169 Nm | 176 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1181 kg | 1250 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 4570 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2560 mm |