1972 Austin 2200 vs. 1992 Plymouth Colt

To start off, 1992 Plymouth Colt is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Austin 2200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Austin 2200 would be higher. At 2,227 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 Austin 2200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Plymouth Colt (111 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 1972 Austin 2200. (110 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Plymouth Colt should accelerate faster than 1972 Austin 2200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Plymouth Colt weights approximately 44 kg more than 1972 Austin 2200. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1972 Austin 2200 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Austin 2200. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Plymouth Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 Austin 2200 (169 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Plymouth Colt. (157 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1972 Austin 2200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Plymouth Colt.

Compare all specifications: