1972 Austin 2200 vs. 1992 Volvo 960
To start off, 1992 Volvo 960 is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Austin 2200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Austin 2200 would be higher. At 2,227 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 Austin 2200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Volvo 960 (187 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 77 more horse power than 1972 Austin 2200. (110 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Volvo 960 should accelerate faster than 1972 Austin 2200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Volvo 960 weights approximately 349 kg more than 1972 Austin 2200. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Austin 2200 | 1992 Volvo 960 | |
Make | Austin | Volvo |
Model | 2200 | 960 |
Year Released | 1972 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2227 cc | 1986 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 110 HP | 187 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1181 kg | 1530 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 4880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2780 mm |