1972 Austin 2200 vs. 1993 Jaguar XJ
To start off, 1993 Jaguar XJ is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Austin 2200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Austin 2200 would be higher. At 5,993 cc (12 cylinders), 1993 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1993 Jaguar XJ (318 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 208 more horse power than 1972 Austin 2200. (110 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1993 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 1972 Austin 2200.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1993 Jaguar XJ (464 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 295 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Austin 2200. (169 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1993 Jaguar XJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Austin 2200.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Austin 2200 | 1993 Jaguar XJ | |
Make | Austin | Jaguar |
Model | 2200 | XJ |
Year Released | 1972 | 1993 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2227 cc | 5993 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 110 HP | 318 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 169 Nm | 464 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 76.2 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 81.3 mm | 78.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 11.0:1 |
Top Speed | 163 km/hour | 250 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 4990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1110 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2880 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 56 L | 90 L |