1972 Austin 2200 vs. 1993 Jaguar XJ220
To start off, 1993 Jaguar XJ220 is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Austin 2200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Austin 2200 would be higher. At 3,498 cc (6 cylinders), 1993 Jaguar XJ220 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1993 Jaguar XJ220 (542 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 432 more horse power than 1972 Austin 2200. (110 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1993 Jaguar XJ220 should accelerate faster than 1972 Austin 2200.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1993 Jaguar XJ220 (642 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 473 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Austin 2200. (169 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1993 Jaguar XJ220 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Austin 2200.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Austin 2200 | 1993 Jaguar XJ220 | |
| Make | Austin | Jaguar |
| Model | 2200 | XJ220 |
| Year Released | 1972 | 1993 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 2227 cc | 3498 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 110 HP | 542 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 7000 RPM |
| Torque | 169 Nm | 642 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 8.3:1 |
| Top Speed | 163 km/hour | 349 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 340 mm |
