1972 Austin 2200 vs. 1995 Mahindra Armada
To start off, 1995 Mahindra Armada is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Austin 2200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Austin 2200 would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Mahindra Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Austin 2200 (110 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 36 more horse power than 1995 Mahindra Armada. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Austin 2200 should accelerate faster than 1995 Mahindra Armada. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Mahindra Armada weights approximately 819 kg more than 1972 Austin 2200.
Because 1995 Mahindra Armada is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1972 Austin 2200. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Mahindra Armada will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Austin 2200 | 1995 Mahindra Armada | |
| Make | Austin | Mahindra |
| Model | 2200 | Armada |
| Year Released | 1972 | 1995 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2227 cc | 2300 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 110 HP | 74 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1181 kg | 2000 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 4310 mm |
