1972 Austin 2200 vs. 1995 Mercury Villager
To start off, 1995 Mercury Villager is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Austin 2200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Austin 2200 would be higher. At 2,960 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Mercury Villager is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Mercury Villager (149 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 39 more horse power than 1972 Austin 2200. (110 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1995 Mercury Villager should accelerate faster than 1972 Austin 2200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Mercury Villager weights approximately 619 kg more than 1972 Austin 2200. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1972 Austin 2200 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Austin 2200. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Mercury Villager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Austin 2200 | 1995 Mercury Villager | |
Make | Austin | Mercury |
Model | 2200 | Villager |
Year Released | 1972 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2227 cc | 2960 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 110 HP | 149 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1181 kg | 1800 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 4950 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2860 mm |