1972 Austin 2200 vs. 1996 Toyota MR2
To start off, 1996 Toyota MR2 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Austin 2200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Austin 2200 would be higher. At 2,227 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 Austin 2200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Austin 2200 (110 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 36 more horse power than 1996 Toyota MR2. (74 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Austin 2200 should accelerate faster than 1996 Toyota MR2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Toyota MR2 weights approximately 434 kg more than 1972 Austin 2200.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 Austin 2200 (169 Nm) has 38 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Toyota MR2. (131 Nm). This means 1972 Austin 2200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Toyota MR2.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Austin 2200 | 1996 Toyota MR2 | |
Make | Austin | Toyota |
Model | 2200 | MR2 |
Year Released | 1972 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2227 cc | 1988 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 110 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 169 Nm | 131 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1181 kg | 1615 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 4150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1250 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2410 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 56 L | 75 L |