1972 Austin 2200 vs. 1997 Daihatsu Move
To start off, 1997 Daihatsu Move is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Austin 2200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Austin 2200 would be higher. At 2,227 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 Austin 2200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Austin 2200 (110 HP) has 67 more horse power than 1997 Daihatsu Move. (43 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Austin 2200 should accelerate faster than 1997 Daihatsu Move.
Because 1972 Austin 2200 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Austin 2200. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Daihatsu Move, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 Austin 2200 (169 Nm) has 81 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Daihatsu Move. (88 Nm). This means 1972 Austin 2200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Daihatsu Move.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Austin 2200 | 1997 Daihatsu Move | |
| Make | Austin | Daihatsu |
| Model | 2200 | Move |
| Year Released | 1972 | 1997 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2227 cc | 847 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 110 HP | 43 HP |
| Torque | 169 Nm | 88 Nm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Top Speed | 163 km/hour | 180 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 3420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1480 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1700 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2350 mm |
