1972 Austin 2200 vs. 1998 Acura TL
To start off, 1998 Acura TL is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Austin 2200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Austin 2200 would be higher. At 2,500 cc (5 cylinders), 1998 Acura TL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Acura TL (176 HP) has 66 more horse power than 1972 Austin 2200. (110 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Acura TL should accelerate faster than 1972 Austin 2200.
Because 1972 Austin 2200 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Austin 2200. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Acura TL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1998 Acura TL has automatic transmission and 1972 Austin 2200 has manual transmission. 1972 Austin 2200 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1998 Acura TL will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Austin 2200 | 1998 Acura TL | |
| Make | Austin | Acura |
| Model | 2200 | TL |
| Year Released | 1972 | 1998 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2227 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 110 HP | 176 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 4864 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1786 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1405 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2840 mm |
