1972 Austin 2200 vs. 2000 BMW 316
To start off, 2000 BMW 316 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Austin 2200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Austin 2200 would be higher. At 2,227 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 Austin 2200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Austin 2200 (110 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 2000 BMW 316. (105 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Austin 2200 should accelerate faster than 2000 BMW 316. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 BMW 316 weights approximately 129 kg more than 1972 Austin 2200.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 Austin 2200 (169 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 19 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 BMW 316. (150 Nm @ 3900 RPM). This means 1972 Austin 2200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 BMW 316.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Austin 2200 | 2000 BMW 316 | |
Make | Austin | BMW |
Model | 2200 | 316 |
Year Released | 1972 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2227 cc | 1596 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 110 HP | 105 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 169 Nm | 150 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3900 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1181 kg | 1310 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2730 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 56 L | 63 L |