1972 Austin 2200 vs. 2000 Ford Equator
To start off, 2000 Ford Equator is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Austin 2200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Austin 2200 would be higher. At 2,227 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 Austin 2200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Equator (128 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 1972 Austin 2200. (110 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Equator should accelerate faster than 1972 Austin 2200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Equator weights approximately 27 kg more than 1972 Austin 2200. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1972 Austin 2200 (169 Nm) has 9 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford Equator. (160 Nm). This means 1972 Austin 2200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford Equator. 2000 Ford Equator has automatic transmission and 1972 Austin 2200 has manual transmission. 1972 Austin 2200 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Ford Equator will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Austin 2200 | 2000 Ford Equator | |
| Make | Austin | Ford |
| Model | 2200 | Equator |
| Year Released | 1972 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2227 cc | 1787 cc |
| Horse Power | 110 HP | 128 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 169 Nm | 160 Nm |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1181 kg | 1208 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 3260 mm |
