1972 Austin 2200 vs. 2000 Mazda AZ
To start off, 2000 Mazda AZ is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Austin 2200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Austin 2200 would be higher. At 2,227 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 Austin 2200 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Austin 2200 weights approximately 431 kg more than 2000 Mazda AZ.
Because 2000 Mazda AZ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1972 Austin 2200. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mazda AZ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Mazda AZ has automatic transmission and 1972 Austin 2200 has manual transmission. 1972 Austin 2200 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Mazda AZ will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Austin 2200 | 2000 Mazda AZ | |
Make | Austin | Mazda |
Model | 2200 | AZ |
Year Released | 1972 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2227 cc | 656 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 110 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1181 kg | 750 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 3400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2370 mm |