1972 Austin 2200 vs. 2001 Fiat Stilo
To start off, 2001 Fiat Stilo is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Austin 2200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Austin 2200 would be higher. At 2,446 cc (5 cylinders), 2001 Fiat Stilo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Fiat Stilo (168 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 58 more horse power than 1972 Austin 2200. (110 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Fiat Stilo should accelerate faster than 1972 Austin 2200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Fiat Stilo weights approximately 85 kg more than 1972 Austin 2200. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1972 Austin 2200 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Austin 2200. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Fiat Stilo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Fiat Stilo (221 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 52 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Austin 2200. (169 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2001 Fiat Stilo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Austin 2200.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Austin 2200 | 2001 Fiat Stilo | |
| Make | Austin | Fiat |
| Model | 2200 | Stilo |
| Year Released | 1972 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2227 cc | 2446 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 110 HP | 168 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5750 RPM |
| Torque | 169 Nm | 221 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 76.2 mm | 83 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 81.3 mm | 90.4 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 11.0:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1181 kg | 1266 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 4190 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2430 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 56 L | 58 L |
