1972 Austin 2200 vs. 2001 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2001 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Austin 2200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Austin 2200 would be higher. At 3,969 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Jeep Wrangler (190 HP) has 80 more horse power than 1972 Austin 2200. (110 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1972 Austin 2200.
Because 2001 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1972 Austin 2200. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Jeep Wrangler (301 Nm) has 132 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Austin 2200. (169 Nm). This means 2001 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Austin 2200.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Austin 2200 | 2001 Jeep Wrangler | |
| Make | Austin | Jeep |
| Model | 2200 | Wrangler |
| Year Released | 1972 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2227 cc | 3969 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 110 HP | 190 HP |
| Torque | 169 Nm | 301 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 3860 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1790 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2380 mm |
