1972 Austin 2200 vs. 2001 Suzuki EV Sport

To start off, 2001 Suzuki EV Sport is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Austin 2200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Austin 2200 would be higher. At 2,227 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 Austin 2200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Suzuki EV Sport (126 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 1972 Austin 2200. (110 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Suzuki EV Sport should accelerate faster than 1972 Austin 2200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Suzuki EV Sport weights approximately 264 kg more than 1972 Austin 2200. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 Austin 2200 (169 Nm) has 63 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Suzuki EV Sport. (106 Nm). This means 1972 Austin 2200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Suzuki EV Sport. 2001 Suzuki EV Sport has automatic transmission and 1972 Austin 2200 has manual transmission. 1972 Austin 2200 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Suzuki EV Sport will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: