1972 Austin 2200 vs. 2001 Toyota Condor
To start off, 2001 Toyota Condor is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Austin 2200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Austin 2200 would be higher. At 2,227 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 Austin 2200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Austin 2200 (110 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 2001 Toyota Condor. (96 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Austin 2200 should accelerate faster than 2001 Toyota Condor. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Toyota Condor weights approximately 245 kg more than 1972 Austin 2200.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 Austin 2200 (169 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 11 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Toyota Condor. (158 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1972 Austin 2200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Toyota Condor.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Austin 2200 | 2001 Toyota Condor | |
Make | Austin | Toyota |
Model | 2200 | Condor |
Year Released | 1972 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2227 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 110 HP | 96 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 169 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 8.8:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1181 kg | 1426 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2540 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 56 L | 70 L |