1972 Austin 2200 vs. 2001 Toyota Condor

To start off, 2001 Toyota Condor is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Austin 2200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Austin 2200 would be higher. At 2,995 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Toyota Condor is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Austin 2200 (110 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 21 more horse power than 2001 Toyota Condor. (89 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Austin 2200 should accelerate faster than 2001 Toyota Condor. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Toyota Condor weights approximately 278 kg more than 1972 Austin 2200.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Toyota Condor (192 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 23 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Austin 2200. (169 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2001 Toyota Condor will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Austin 2200.

Compare all specifications:

1972 Austin 2200 2001 Toyota Condor
Make Austin Toyota
Model 2200 Condor
Year Released 1972 2001
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2227 cc 2995 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 110 HP 89 HP
Engine RPM 5250 RPM 4000 RPM
Torque 169 Nm 192 Nm
Torque RPM 3500 RPM 2400 RPM
Engine Bore Size 76.2 mm 99.5 mm
Engine Stroke Size 81.3 mm 96 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.0:1 22.2:1
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 8 seats
Vehicle Weight 1181 kg 1459 kg
Wheelbase Size 2700 mm 2700 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 56 L 70 L