1972 Austin 2200 vs. 2002 Mitsubishi Dingo
To start off, 2002 Mitsubishi Dingo is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Austin 2200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Austin 2200 would be higher. At 2,227 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 Austin 2200 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Austin 2200 weights approximately 11 kg more than 2002 Mitsubishi Dingo.
Because 2002 Mitsubishi Dingo is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1972 Austin 2200. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Mitsubishi Dingo will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2002 Mitsubishi Dingo has automatic transmission and 1972 Austin 2200 has manual transmission. 1972 Austin 2200 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Mitsubishi Dingo will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Austin 2200 | 2002 Mitsubishi Dingo | |
| Make | Austin | Mitsubishi |
| Model | 2200 | Dingo |
| Year Released | 1972 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2227 cc | 1300 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 110 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1181 kg | 1170 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 3900 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1710 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1650 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2450 mm |
