1972 Austin 2200 vs. 2003 Mazda 2
To start off, 2003 Mazda 2 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Austin 2200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Austin 2200 would be higher. At 2,227 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 Austin 2200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Austin 2200 (110 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 2003 Mazda 2. (79 HP @ 5700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Austin 2200 should accelerate faster than 2003 Mazda 2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Austin 2200 weights approximately 131 kg more than 2003 Mazda 2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1972 Austin 2200 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Austin 2200. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Mazda 2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 Austin 2200 (169 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 41 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Mazda 2. (128 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1972 Austin 2200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Mazda 2.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Austin 2200 | 2003 Mazda 2 | |
Make | Austin | Mazda |
Model | 2200 | 2 |
Year Released | 1972 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2227 cc | 1388 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 110 HP | 79 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Torque | 169 Nm | 128 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 76.2 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 81.3 mm | 76.5 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1181 kg | 1050 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 3930 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2500 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 56 L | 50 L |