1972 Austin 2200 vs. 2003 Westfield XTR 2
To start off, 2003 Westfield XTR 2 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Austin 2200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Austin 2200 would be higher. At 2,227 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 Austin 2200 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Austin 2200 | 2003 Westfield XTR 2 | |
Make | Austin | Westfield |
Model | 2200 | XTR 2 |
Year Released | 1972 | 2003 |
Engine Size | 2227 cc | 1779 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 110 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 3690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2320 mm |