1972 Austin 2200 vs. 2004 Mazda B3000
To start off, 2004 Mazda B3000 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Austin 2200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Austin 2200 would be higher. At 2,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Mazda B3000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda B3000 (155 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 45 more horse power than 1972 Austin 2200. (110 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda B3000 should accelerate faster than 1972 Austin 2200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mazda B3000 weights approximately 329 kg more than 1972 Austin 2200. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mazda B3000 (244 Nm) has 75 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Austin 2200. (169 Nm). This means 2004 Mazda B3000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Austin 2200.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Austin 2200 | 2004 Mazda B3000 | |
Make | Austin | Mazda |
Model | 2200 | B3000 |
Year Released | 1972 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2227 cc | 2966 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 110 HP | 155 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 169 Nm | 244 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 76.2 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 81.3 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.1:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1181 kg | 1510 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 5160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 3200 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 56 L | 74 L |