1972 Austin 2200 vs. 2004 Nissan Sentra
To start off, 2004 Nissan Sentra is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Austin 2200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Austin 2200 would be higher. At 2,506 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Nissan Sentra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Nissan Sentra (165 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 1972 Austin 2200. (110 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Nissan Sentra should accelerate faster than 1972 Austin 2200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Nissan Sentra weights approximately 72 kg more than 1972 Austin 2200. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1972 Austin 2200 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Austin 2200. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Nissan Sentra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Nissan Sentra (244 Nm) has 75 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Austin 2200. (169 Nm). This means 2004 Nissan Sentra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Austin 2200.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Austin 2200 | 2004 Nissan Sentra | |
| Make | Austin | Nissan |
| Model | 2200 | Sentra |
| Year Released | 1972 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2227 cc | 2506 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 110 HP | 165 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Torque | 169 Nm | 244 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 76.2 mm | 89 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 81.3 mm | 100 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.5:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1181 kg | 1253 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 4520 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2630 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 56 L | 50 L |
