1972 Austin 2200 vs. 2004 Renault Megane

To start off, 2004 Renault Megane is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Austin 2200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Austin 2200 would be higher. At 2,227 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 Austin 2200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Austin 2200 (110 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 2004 Renault Megane. (96 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Austin 2200 should accelerate faster than 2004 Renault Megane.

Because 1972 Austin 2200 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Austin 2200. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Renault Megane, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 Austin 2200 (169 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 42 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Renault Megane. (127 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 1972 Austin 2200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Renault Megane.

Compare all specifications:

1972 Austin 2200 2004 Renault Megane
Make Austin Renault
Model 2200 Megane
Year Released 1972 2004
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2227 cc 1461 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 110 HP 96 HP
Engine RPM 5250 RPM 5500 RPM
Torque 169 Nm 127 Nm
Torque RPM 3500 RPM 3750 RPM
Engine Bore Size 76.2 mm 79.6 mm
Engine Stroke Size 81.3 mm 70 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.0:1 9.8:1
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Length 4250 mm 4500 mm
Vehicle Width 1450 mm 1780 mm
Vehicle Height 1440 mm 1470 mm
Wheelbase Size 2700 mm 2690 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 56 L 70 L