1972 Austin 2200 vs. 2004 Renault Scenic

To start off, 2004 Renault Scenic is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Austin 2200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Austin 2200 would be higher. At 2,227 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 Austin 2200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Austin 2200 (110 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 36 more horse power than 2004 Renault Scenic. (74 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Austin 2200 should accelerate faster than 2004 Renault Scenic. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Renault Scenic weights approximately 523 kg more than 1972 Austin 2200.

Because 1972 Austin 2200 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Austin 2200. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Renault Scenic, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 Austin 2200 (169 Nm) has 64 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Renault Scenic. (105 Nm). This means 1972 Austin 2200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Renault Scenic.

Compare all specifications: