1972 Austin 2200 vs. 2005 Kia K2700
To start off, 2005 Kia K2700 is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Austin 2200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Austin 2200 would be higher. At 2,665 cc, 2005 Kia K2700 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Austin 2200 (110 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 2005 Kia K2700. (83 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Austin 2200 should accelerate faster than 2005 Kia K2700. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Kia K2700 weights approximately 349 kg more than 1972 Austin 2200.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Kia K2700 (175 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 6 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Austin 2200. (169 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2005 Kia K2700 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Austin 2200.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Austin 2200 | 2005 Kia K2700 | |
| Make | Austin | Kia |
| Model | 2200 | K2700 |
| Year Released | 1972 | 2005 |
| Engine Size | 2227 cc | 2665 cc |
| Horse Power | 110 HP | 83 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 169 Nm | 175 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2400 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 76.2 mm | 94.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 81.3 mm | 95 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1181 kg | 1530 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2390 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 56 L | 60 L |
