1972 Austin 2200 vs. 2006 Dodge Ram
To start off, 2006 Dodge Ram is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Austin 2200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Austin 2200 would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Dodge Ram (216 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 106 more horse power than 1972 Austin 2200. (110 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 1972 Austin 2200.
Because 2006 Dodge Ram is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1972 Austin 2200. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Dodge Ram will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Dodge Ram (319 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 150 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Austin 2200. (169 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2006 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Austin 2200.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Austin 2200 | 2006 Dodge Ram | |
Make | Austin | Dodge |
Model | 2200 | Ram |
Year Released | 1972 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2227 cc | 3700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 110 HP | 216 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 169 Nm | 319 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.9:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 6350 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1880 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 4080 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 56 L | 68 L |