1972 Austin 2200 vs. 2006 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2006 Ford Ecosport is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Austin 2200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Austin 2200 would be higher. At 2,227 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 Austin 2200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ecosport (143 HP) has 33 more horse power than 1972 Austin 2200. (110 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ecosport should accelerate faster than 1972 Austin 2200.
Because 2006 Ford Ecosport is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1972 Austin 2200. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ecosport will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2006 Ford Ecosport has automatic transmission and 1972 Austin 2200 has manual transmission. 1972 Austin 2200 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Ford Ecosport will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Austin 2200 | 2006 Ford Ecosport | |
| Make | Austin | Ford |
| Model | 2200 | Ecosport |
| Year Released | 1972 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2227 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 110 HP | 143 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 4228 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1980 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1679 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2490 mm |
