1972 Austin 2200 vs. 2006 Nissan Frontier
To start off, 2006 Nissan Frontier is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Austin 2200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Austin 2200 would be higher. At 2,501 cc, 2006 Nissan Frontier is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Nissan Frontier (235 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 66 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Austin 2200. (169 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2006 Nissan Frontier will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Austin 2200.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Austin 2200 | 2006 Nissan Frontier | |
Make | Austin | Nissan |
Model | 2200 | Frontier |
Year Released | 1972 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2227 cc | 2501 cc |
Horse Power | 110 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 169 Nm | 235 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 5230 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 3200 mm |