1972 Austin 2200 vs. 2007 Nissan 350Z
To start off, 2007 Nissan 350Z is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Austin 2200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Austin 2200 would be higher. At 3,496 cc (6 cylinders), 2007 Nissan 350Z is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Nissan 350Z (297 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 187 more horse power than 1972 Austin 2200. (110 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Nissan 350Z should accelerate faster than 1972 Austin 2200.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Nissan 350Z (363 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 194 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Austin 2200. (169 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2007 Nissan 350Z will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Austin 2200.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Austin 2200 | 2007 Nissan 350Z | |
Make | Austin | Nissan |
Model | 2200 | 350Z |
Year Released | 1972 | 2007 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2227 cc | 3496 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 110 HP | 297 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 169 Nm | 363 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 76.2 mm | 95.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 81.3 mm | 81.4 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 10.3:1 |
Top Speed | 163 km/hour | 250 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 4320 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1320 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2660 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 56 L | 80 L |